WOMEN-IN-HOCKEY Digest 133

Topics covered in this issue include:

  1) Re: Roster Limits
	by Sheri Bacon 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 10:48:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Sheri Bacon 
To: Kim Yeoh 
Subject: Re: Roster Limits
Message-ID: 

Actually I remember last year we had this problem.  Our league solved it 
by making a "sub" rule.  If a player can't commit for all of the games 
they would be considered a "sub" and could play when they were able.  I 
don't know all of the logistics to this and how they set it up but it 
might be a solution for you...

On Thu, 4 Jan 1996, Kim Yeoh wrote:

> Does any other women's (senior division) ice hockey team find difficulty
with the 20 player (18 skaters, 2 goalies) maximum roster rule set by USA
Hockey?  This year in particular we are finding that we have more than 20
women interested in playing, but few can commit to playing all the games
(due to numerous other commitments).  So when we are only able to roster
20 women, we often find that we have less that number available to play
many of our games (even though there are others who could play, but did
not fit on our original roster).  I'd be interested in knowing if this is
a common problem among other senior division teams (particularly women's).
Thanks,  
Kim 
email@hidden

------------------------------

End of WOMEN-IN-HOCKEY Digest 133
*********************************